Skip to content
dialegein

Website availability check

Every tool in this index is checked once a night with a single request to its site. What follows is whether that site answered and how quickly, straight from the same data that puts the badge on each profile. A response is not a verdict on the software: a marketing page can answer in 200 milliseconds while the product behind it is unusable, and a slow response can be our network rather than theirs.

Responded
153
Refused our check
2
No response
0
Not checked
0

What these readings mean, and what they do not

  • A refusal is not an outage. 2 of these sites answer robots with a challenge or a 403 — usually Cloudflare or similar bot protection. That tells you something about our request, not about their service, and we do not call it a fault.
  • One request, once a night. Each figure is a single HTTP request from one machine at one moment. A site that is up can time out once, and 30 readings is not a reliability record — it is a recent history.
  • We check the address we link to, which is the product's own site. A tool that is down behind a working marketing page will read as responding here.
  • Low-delay is not a ranking. Response time measures one request from one place, and it moves with the network. It is shown because a reader waiting two seconds deserves to know that other tools answer in a tenth of that.

Last checked 16 October 2026 at 11:18 UTC, which is 2 hours ago . The nightly run writes this data to the repository and the site is rebuilt from it.

Every tool

Ordered by what our check saw, worst first, then alphabetically.

Tool What our check saw Recent checks
PandaDoc We could not check 0%
Spire.PDF We could not check 0%
ABBYY FineReader PDF Responded in 339 ms 100%
AccessibilityNow Responded in 99 ms 96.7%
Adobe Acrobat Responded in 76 ms 100%
Adobe PDF Accessibility Auto-Tag API Responded in 324 ms 100%
Adobe PDF Extract API Responded in 8 ms 100%
Adobe PDF Library Responded in 1025 ms 100%
Adobe Scan Responded in 28 ms 100%
Allyant PDF Validator Responded in 178 ms 100%
Amazon Textract Responded in 68 ms 100%
Antenna House Formatter Responded in 146 ms 100%
Apache FOP Responded in 92 ms 100%
Apache PDFBox Responded in 36 ms 100%
Apache Tika Responded in 50 ms 100%
Apple Preview Responded in 392 ms 100%
Apryse Responded in 359 ms 100%
Aspose.PDF Responded in 138 ms 100%
AvePDF Responded in 273 ms 100%
axesCheck Responded in 648 ms 100%
axesPDF Responded in 745 ms 100%
Azure AI Document Intelligence Responded in 176 ms 100%
Bluebeam Revu Responded in 163 ms 100%
borb Responded in 498 ms 100%
Camelot Responded in 176 ms 100%
CamScanner Responded in 532 ms 100%
Chunkr Responded in 375 ms 100%
CommonLook Office Responded in 152 ms 100%
CommonLook PDF Responded in 58 ms 100%
DocHub Responded in 114 ms 100%
Docling Responded in 54 ms 100%
DocRaptor Responded in 148 ms 100%
Documenso Responded in 60 ms 100%
DocuSeal Responded in 130 ms 100%
DocuSign Responded in 117 ms 100%
dompdf Responded in 113 ms 100%
Dropbox Sign Responded in 136 ms 100%
Equidox Responded in 161 ms 100%
Foxit PDF Editor Responded in 612 ms 100%
Foxit PDF SDK Responded in 201 ms 100%
fpdf2 Responded in 380 ms 100%
FPDI Responded in 605 ms 100%
Genius Scan Responded in 161 ms 100%
Ghostscript Responded in 157 ms 100%
gImageReader Responded in 325 ms 100%
Goodnotes Responded in 236 ms 100%
Google Chrome built-in PDF viewer Responded in 276 ms 100%
Google Cloud Vision API and Document AI Responded in 150 ms 100%
Gotenberg Responded in 99 ms 100%
GROBID Responded in 668 ms 100%
GroupDocs Responded in 95 ms 100%
ICEpdf Responded in 579 ms 100%
iLovePDF Responded in 84 ms 100%
IronPDF Responded in 39 ms 100%
iText Responded in 141 ms 100%
JPedal Responded in 424 ms 100%
jpgtopdf Responded in 851 ms 100%
jsPDF Responded in 364 ms 100%
LEADTOOLS PDF SDK Responded in 205 ms 100%
Level Access Responded in 147 ms 100%
LibreOffice Draw Responded in 981 ms 100%
LlamaParse Responded in 67 ms 100%
Marker Responded in 393 ms 100%
Master PDF Editor Responded in 648 ms 100%
Microsoft Edge PDF reader and editor Responded in 121 ms 100%
Microsoft Lens Responded in 142 ms 100%
Microsoft OneDrive document scanning Responded in 132 ms 100%
Mindee Responded in 82 ms 100%
mPDF Responded in 104 ms 100%
MuPDF (mutool) Responded in 203 ms 100%
MuPDF.js Responded in 247 ms 100%
Nitro PDF Pro Responded in 99 ms 100%
No Fuss PDF Responded in 298 ms 100%
Notability Responded in 319 ms 100%
Nougat Responded in 401 ms 100%
Nutrient Responded in 85 ms 100%
OCRmyPDF Responded in 95 ms 100%
Okular Responded in 604 ms 100%
OpenDocScan Responded in 248 ms 100%
OpenSign Responded in 143 ms 100%
PAC Responded in 832 ms 100%
PDF Architect Responded in 101 ms 100%
PDF Arranger Responded in 311 ms 100%
PDF Candy Responded in 295 ms 100%
PDF Compare Responded in 441 ms 100%
PDF Expert Responded in 153 ms 100%
PDF Studio Responded in 710 ms 100%
pdf-lib Responded in 85 ms 100%
pdf-redactor Responded in 396 ms 96.7%
PDF-XChange Core API SDK Responded in 627 ms 100%
PDF-XChange Editor Responded in 518 ms 100%
PDF.js Responded in 93 ms 100%
PDF24 Responded in 56 ms 100%
PDF2Go Responded in 215 ms 100%
pdfaPilot Responded in 446 ms 100%
pdfcpu Responded in 212 ms 100%
PDFescape Responded in 215 ms 96.7%
PDFgear Responded in 153 ms 100%
pdfGoHTML Responded in 352 ms 100%
PDFium Responded in 427 ms 80%
PDFix Responded in 806 ms 90%
PDFlib Responded in 648 ms 100%
pdfminer.six Responded in 55 ms 100%
pdfplumber Responded in 388 ms 100%
pdfRest Responded in 65 ms 100%
PDFsam Responded in 280 ms 100%
PDFsharp Responded in 181 ms 100%
PDFShift Responded in 113 ms 100%
pdftk-java Responded in 451 ms 100%
pdfToolbox Responded in 400 ms 100%
Pdftools PDF Viewer SDK Responded in 70 ms 100%
Pdftools SDK Responded in 13 ms 100%
pikepdf Responded in 242 ms 100%
Poppler Responded in 565 ms 100%
Power PDF Responded in 778 ms 96.7%
PREP Responded in 2358 ms 100%
Prince Responded in 243 ms 100%
PrizmDoc Responded in 106 ms 100%
PyMuPDF Responded in 234 ms 100%
pypdf Responded in 321 ms 100%
Qoppa Java PDF SDK Responded in 778 ms 100%
qpdf Responded in 142 ms 100%
Reducto Responded in 231 ms 100%
ReportLab Responded in 777 ms 100%
RoboBraille Responded in 940 ms 100%
Scanbot SDK Responded in 530 ms 100%
Scanner Pro Responded in 96 ms 100%
Sejda Responded in 473 ms 100%
SensusAccess Responded in 908 ms 100%
SetaPDF-Core Responded in 469 ms 100%
SignNow Responded in 246 ms 100%
SignWell Responded in 182 ms 100%
SimplePDF Responded in 400 ms 100%
Smallpdf Responded in 118 ms 100%
SnackPDF Responded in 1905 ms 100%
Soda PDF Responded in 165 ms 100%
Solid Framework Responded in 935 ms 100%
Stirling PDF Responded in 154 ms 100%
SumatraPDF Responded in 486 ms 100%
Surya Responded in 356 ms 100%
SwiftScan Responded in 152 ms 100%
Syncfusion PDF Responded in 90 ms 100%
Tabula Responded in 61 ms 100%
tc-lib-pdf Responded in 342 ms 100%
Telerik Document Processing Libraries Responded in 162 ms 100%
Tesseract OCR Responded in 72 ms 100%
Tesseract.js Responded in 93 ms 100%
Unstructured Responded in 425 ms 100%
veraPDF Responded in 602 ms 100%
Vivliostyle Responded in 101 ms 100%
WeasyPrint Responded in 401 ms 100%
Wondershare PDFelement Responded in 771 ms 100%
Xodo Responded in 633 ms 100%
Xournal++ Responded in 87 ms 100%
zathura Responded in 326 ms 100%

The checker is scripts/check-availability.mjs, it runs nightly from a scheduled job, and every reading is committed to the repository so the history is auditable rather than asserted. It makes one request per tool and records what came back.

This page is not a service status board and nothing here should be taken as one. If a tool looks wrong to you and our reading disagrees, trust what you are seeing — and tell us , because a stale reading is a bug on our side.