Skip to content
dialegein

PDFsam

Desktop PDF split and merge apps — Basic is free and open source, others paid.

Where your files are processed

No server involved

Desktop applications for Windows, macOS and Linux. There is no web service to upload to.

Stated plainly by the vendor: files never leave your computer, and the desktop applications do not upload PDF content. The paid editions do contact their servers for licence checks and updates.

What it does

PDFsam is a family of desktop applications rather than a web service. PDFsam Basic is a free, open-source tool for merging, splitting, extracting, rotating and mixing PDFs. PDFsam Visual adds compression, cropping, metadata cleaning and encryption, and PDFsam Enhanced for Windows is a full editor with OCR, conversion, forms and digital signatures. Every edition runs on your own computer.

Best for: Anyone who wants offline, no-upload PDF processing — particularly a free, dependable split and merge tool across Windows, macOS and Linux.

Worth knowing: The editions differ sharply. OCR, conversion, editing and signing live only in the paid Enhanced edition, which is Windows-only and subscription-based, and Visual still needs a licence after a 14-day trial. For merging specifically, the Basic edition is a free installed tool and the vendor documents what a merge needs: page ranges, bookmark handling, field-name collision handling between the source documents, and mixing pages from different files. Those are the facts to compare on, and the Enhanced redaction capability is a separate paid edition rather than something Basic includes. Capabilities and pricing are bound to editions rather than to the brand: OCR, conversion, editing and signing are Enhanced only, Visual needs a licence after its trial, and Basic is the free one. The merge listing names PDFsam Basic, and redaction belongs to the Enhanced edition with its own plan evidence.

Details, and where each comes from

Vendor statements, our own reading of their pages, and the things nobody has established yet, each answered separately. Where we have not confirmed something it says so rather than guessing, and a row nobody has established is greyed out.

Versions covered
Windows · macOS · Linux
Website
pdfsam.org
Requires an account
No
Free tier
Yes
Watermark on the free tier
No
Maximum file size
Not verified
Batch processing
Yes
Data residency
Not verified
Open source
Yes
Self-hostable
No
Licence
PDFsam Basic: AGPL-3.0. Visual and Enhanced: proprietary
Redaction
Removes the content
Programmatic access
None
Last availability check
Responded in 280 ms 16 October 2026

Checked automatically by our own runner, not reported by the vendor. 100% of our last 30 checks got a response.

What the redaction verdict rests on

From the vendor's own documentation, read 22 September 2026. Not tested by us.

“PDFsam Enhanced has a Redaction tool. This will permanently delete information from your document. It’s the digital equivalent of redacting physical documents.”

What that does not establish: Vendor support documentation, not a test we ran. It describes PDFsam ENHANCED, which is a different and paid edition from the free PDFsam Basic, and the page does not resolve which tier includes the tool — the edition question is the one that matters here. The same vendor also publishes a whiteout article, and whiteout is the covering operation; the two must not be read as one feature.

https://support-enhanced.pdfsam.org/hc/en-us/articles/21705219146388-How-to-redact-my-file

What the vendor says

Claims are labelled rather than repeated as fact. Where we have checked something ourselves, it says so and shows when. Checked means we read the vendor's own page and it says what we recorded — not that we tested the behaviour, unless the note says we did.

  • “Your files never leave your computer.”

    Checked by us — the source says this Read 22 September 2026

    Verbatim on the homepage, where it stands as its own line. The privacy-policy half of the original claim is recorded as a separate claim so that each rests on the page it actually came from.

    Standing: Re-read and matched byte for byte

    Check it yourself: the source, the SHA-256, and how we checked
    From
    the text a browser renders
    SHA-256
    dcdafd99010e038dc7fda1302cc840016ec27d659d165474cec75c1b3c54247d

    How we checked: Re-verified verbatim on 2026-09-22: https://pdfsam.org/ re-rendered in headless Chrome with scripts/render-page.mjs and this sentence found in the rendered text. This claim was SPLIT on 2026-09-22 out of a longer one whose evidence spanned two pages. One claim can carry one hash and one evidence file, so a two-source claim cannot be verified by a re-render at all — the pass read the homepage, found a short run of the longer claim's words, and reported it changed when it was in fact fully supported. Dividing it at the source boundary makes both halves checkable. sourceHash is the SHA-256 of the re-rendered text, held as rv-pdfsam-org-a0cf9a64.txt.

    What this hash proves, and what it does not

  • “All our applications process PDF files locally. No content in your PDF files is automatically sent or uploaded to our servers from our desktop applications.”

    Checked by us — the source says this Read 22 September 2026

    Verbatim on the privacy policy. The original single claim carried this and the homepage sentence together, which is why neither half could be verified on its own.

    Standing: Re-read, and the recorded hash was not reproduced

    Check it yourself: the source, the SHA-256, and how we checked
    From
    the raw HTTP response
    SHA-256
    ea695fee184e3b07ef1e40a94c0d53df8ceb9ebfbafe42f167074a33b23273fc
    Note
    neither the raw response nor a render reproduced the recorded hash (83404 chars, recorded ea695fee18…)

    How we checked: Re-verified verbatim on 2026-09-22: https://pdfsam.org/privacy-policy/ rendered in headless Chrome with scripts/render-page.mjs and this wording found in the rendered text. This claim was SPLIT on 2026-09-22 out of a longer one whose evidence spanned two pages. One claim can carry one hash and one evidence file, so a two-source claim cannot be verified by a re-render at all — the pass read the homepage, found a short run of the longer claim's words, and reported it changed when it was in fact fully supported. Dividing it at the source boundary makes both halves checkable. sourceHash is the SHA-256 of the rendered text, held as p9-pdfsam.txt — note that this is the RENDERED page, so it differs from the hash of the raw response the original method recorded; both are the same document read two ways.

    What this hash proves, and what it does not

Each claim is quoted from the vendor's own pages. This section describes what we have and have not checked — it is not a judgement about anyone.

Sponsorship is distribution, not an endorsement or a promise of search rankings, AI citations, traffic, or sales. This listing is a free entry, compiled from published sources.

Visit PDFsam Report a problem

Related reading

How this record was put together

Editorial review.
No editor has signed this record off. That is not the same as nothing having been checked, and the lines below say what has.
Source reading.
2 claims taken from the vendor's own pages, read between 22 September 2026 and 22 September 2026.
Website availability.
The vendor's site was last checked on 16 October 2026.
Behaviour testing.
We ran this ourselves. The file handling was watched directly.

Sources: pdfsam.org; pdfsam.org privacy policy; Visual and Enhanced download pages. Vendor claims, not independently verified.